12/23/2023 0 Comments El nominalismo de guillermo de ockhamAccidents in the remaining seven categories are relative things ( respectus) that have their foundations either in the substance, inhere in dimensive quantity immediately and The inherence of dimensive quantity other absolute quality-accidents such as color, flavor, odor, shape, etc. For example, when Socrates and Plato are similar, a relative similarity thing inheres in Socrates' Quantity, or qualities and their term in something else. ![]() Whiteness and is Socrates' similarity to Plato, while another relative similarity-thing inheres in Plato's whiteness and is Plato's similarity to Socrates. Reasons that lie beyond the scope of this paper,(2) Ockham thought this ontology was as prolific of contradiction and absurdity as it was of entities. His ownĬontention is that the truth of a proposition depends not merely on which things exist, but on how they exist. ![]() Then I shall examine a series of objections that his own ontology offers no advantage commensurate with this In what follows, I shall explain how Ockham sacrifices the simplicity of across-the-board adherence to (T1) and (T2), applying them only to aĬertain range of case in the category of quality. #El nominalismo guillermo de ockham series Ockham's theory of truth-conditions is calculated to accomodate his ontology. He adopts a two-name theory of predication forĬategories involving absolute terms only, and admits the inherence-analysis for only a restricted range of concrete quality terms. ![]() #El nominalismo guillermo de ockham seriesĪlthough he arguesĮxtensively that its wider application to the last eight Aristotelian categories of accident leads to contradiction and absurdity, his own positive proposal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |